Hi With respect to all what you said. I would like to show you a case here will show that all what you stated down is not correct at least for RSA. Here is attached links to problem encountered in RSA for design column (for compression and one direction bending ) according to ACI which is the simplest in column design (hundreds of software's calculate it perfectly. Jbl serial number registry.

Download AutoCAD 2002 Pre-Release Expiration crack by MoFoQ added to the site Jul-03-2007 rating 4 autocad2002prereleaseexpirationcrackmofoq.zip (9013 bytes) name.

Even manually is easy to check. After investigation I found out that ACI 2002, 2005, 2008, 2011 all implemented in RSA calculate it wrongly. Which that means this problem have almost 12 years and no one find it. My question is Where is the process the one you are talking about?

Where is the quality assurance of the software? Where is the testing of the software? Where is the design manual of the software? Where is the design examples prove that the software working well? Do you know that this ridiculous mistake which is the basic in engineering which is impossibly to believe that RSA can have this mistake Thats why no one check it before. Do you know that this mistake have big impact on building safety? Do you know that all concrete projects has designed in RSA with ACI code have this problem?

Do you know that building maybe will fail because of this problems and many people will be killed? Do you know that this criminal case? Now I hope that you have a power to answer me? To Autodesk RSA product mangers: Please dont hide your selves and face us with the truth? To Autodesk strategy for structural engineering and to whom has concern and wants to Re-engineering structural analysis for the future Please try to learn first what is structural analysis and fix your own problems and try to enhance your products to get some credibility so the users will listen to you. Then thin about that. AS OF NOW WE DONT Believe you!!!!!!!!!!!!!!

Klyuch aktivacii dlya chernaya akula youtube. As you said there is many errors have to be fixed and features need to be added to RSA. For me I suffer especially from the point of design shear walls and core walls.and since of many years no thing has been changed.At least design shear wall out of its plane!

In steel structures RSA do very well but I think in concrete structures design there are a lot of problems I face. Another important thing is the Help of RSA; it is so poor of information comparing with another softwares like Etabs. I really look forward to keep RSA alive and wish Autodesk team take into considerations your precious notes and suggestions. Dear, Autodesk managers I am working on RSA when i was undergraduate student, i took the decision to invest in RSA and try to publish tutorials about it and succeeded. In 2014, January, I created a group on fb.